I am going to vent a little here.
I don’t understand why web hosting companies (and dedicated server providers for that matter) continue to provide Fedora Core based servers to customers. It just doesn’t make sense. Fedora Core was never intended to be used in a production enviroment and why people keep using in those enviroments baffles me.
We had a server that was running Fedora Core 4 and cPanel and has been in production for almost a year. It was always updated and properly maintained… that is until RedHat dropped updates for it (which they do every 6 months as that is the development cycle for Fedora). Dropping updates isn’t that big of a deal as there is the Fedora Legacy Project that continues to provide updates after RedHat has dropped updates.
Here is what happened with this server, Fedora Core 4 was dropped from RedHat support, and was being taken over by Fedora Legacy. No big deal, this has happened a bunch of times in the past with previous Fedora Core versions. The problem enters when you throw in a local kernel exploit that is discovered for the /proc fs. We attempted to upgrade this kernel to prevent this problem, but because FC4 was in a state of transition between the two providers, the updates weren’t available yet. As such this server was put into the “holding for update” queue.
In that time the server was hacked and needed to be wiped and reinstalled with another OS that won’t cause this particular problem (CentOS 4.3).
What we recommend to customers instead of Fedora Core?
CentOS: RedHat Enterprise Linux based OS. They grab the source RPM files from RedHat and remove the images that reference RedHat and replace them with CentOS based images, and other minor modifications, but generally this is the same code that is used to run RedHat Enterprise Linux. Because it is based on RHEL it has a good development cycle as well as excellent support for new drivers. Does it have it’s problems? Yes, any problem that exists in RHEL will also exist in CentOS (various spin_lock kernel panic issues have been documented).
We recommend the use of CentOS for any application that does not support our number one OS of choice.
Debian (stable): I admit it. I am a big fan of Debian. It works great and I am very familair with it. It handles in place version upgrades (moving from woody to sarge was done with minimal effort using apt-get dist-upgrade). It has an easy to use package manager, with a large selection of applications, as well as an active developer community. My biggest problem with Debian is the that the kernel gets out of date very quickly. Unlike CentOS which actually backports drivers from a more current kernel revision (for instance 2.6.16) into the current standardized kernel for the OS (2.6.9 for CentOS 4.3), Debian does not do that. So it is often a chore to get Debian to run (or even install) on newer chipsets.
Overall, Debian is the winner for us. We install it anytime we have the option (even for Virtual Private Servers) as it just works. It has its faults and is by no means perfect, but we are willing to over look those as they are minor in comparison to the benefits it can provide in ease of management and administration.
So to recap:
- Don’t use Fedora Core for a production server, it will only cause you pain and suffering in the long run.
- Anyone that suggests you use Fedora Core in a production enviroment has not analyised the potential ramifications of that decision completely.
- There are many viable alternatives that are actively developed and maintained as well as providing up to date and current device driver support and security updates.
Don’t use Fedora Core on a production machine.